
Grade
How this grade was reached
2 of 6 checks count
- Calls vs chanceNot reliably different from chance (55% vs 47%): no change
- Paid accessChecked, not counted yet: this check is still in its precision audit
- Paid promotionChecked, not counted yet: this check is still in its precision audit
- Referral linksChecked: nothing found
- Removed postsNot measured yet: removals count after 30 days of watching
- Regulator listsNot checked yet
- Starting pointEveryone starts at BBB: no red flags found on the checks below.BBB
- FindingsThe checks below found nothing against them.no change
- CallsTheir calls were tested against chance: 55% came good where chance would give 47%. On about 107 calls, an 8-point gap could still be luck: moving a grade needs a record that luck alone would produce less than once in a thousand, so the grade does not change. On this record, the test would reliably detect only an edge of about 23 points or more, so “in line with chance” means there is not yet enough evidence either way, not that there is no skill.55% came goodchance 47%no change
- GradeBBBNo red flags found on the checks listed. The starting point for everyone.
What we checked
- Material read
- 471 of their own items and their profile · X profile, posts on X
- Sells paid access
- None found
- Invites paid promotion
- None found
- Referral links
- None found
- Removes their record
- Not yet measured. Removals count only after 30 days of watching, so this grade is provisional until then.
- Regulator warning lists
- Not yet checked
- Last public post
- 0 days ago
- How they talk
- 86% of their directional statements name a price level(described, not scored)
Calls on record
110 calls · 59 hit · 51 missed · 0 open
34 restatements of a call that was still open, each counted once
Hit rate
The rate the call test uses, against what chance would score on the same kinds of call. Recent calls weigh more, and a call restated while still open counts once.
Plain count, every resolved call equal: 59 of 110 came true (54%).
Call history
HitMissOpen, not yet resolved
Market coverage
ETH 28 (25%)LINK 27 (25%)XRP 27 (25%)LTC 20 (18%)Other 8 (7%)
- 21 SeptMiss
LINKLongtrigger 13 → test level 13.39
LINK Daily Technical Outlook: $LINK closed indecisively.
Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 21 SeptHit
LTCLongtrigger 59 → test level 60.77
LTC Daily Technical Outlook: $LTC closed indecisively.
Restates a call that was still open · counted once.Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 21 SeptHit
ETHLongtrigger 2,700 → test level 2,781
ETH Daily Technical Outlook: $ETH closed indecisively.
Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 21 SeptHit
BTCLongtrigger 82,000 → test level 84,460
BTC Daily Technical Outlook: $BTC closed indecisively.
Restates a call that was still open · counted once.Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 20 SeptHit
XRPLongtrigger 1.42 → test level 1.4626
XRP Daily Technical Outlook: $XRP closed green and indecisively.
Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 20 SeptHit
LTCLongtrigger 59 → test level 60.77
LTC Daily Technical Outlook: $LTC closed indecisively.
Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 19 SeptHit
LINKLong12.226 → 13· 3d
LINK Daily Technical Outlook: $LINK closed bullish and is now holding above the $12.00 support.
Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 19 SeptHit
ETHLongtrigger 2,580 → test level 2,691
ETH Daily Technical Outlook: $ETH closed bullish.
Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 19 SeptHit
BTCLongtrigger 82,000 → test level 84,460
BTC Daily Technical Outlook: $BTC closed bullish.
Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 18 SeptHit
ETHLong2,613 → 2,800· 4d
⚠️ OFF TO THE RACES 🐎 Houston we have liftoff… 🔮 I don’t want to jinx it, but $ETH could finally be breaking its multi-month resistance after multiple failed…
Target reached inside the window.source ↗
Grade history
All rating changes →Every change of this person's published letter, newest first, with what moved it.
- AABBB
New rating method (v5.1): No red flags on the checks listed
- BBBAA
Calls beat chance (56% vs 42%)
- AABBB
Calls in line with chance (56% vs 42%)
- BBAA
New rating method (v5): Calls beat chance (56% vs 42%)
Not yet measured. reviewed evidence, wallets, publishing cadence.
Closest in Crypto
See the whole sector →| Name | Category | Reach | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crypto | 88K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 27K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 167K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 110K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 15K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 31K | BBB |
Is this you? Claim this profile →
This grade is TradeGrade's opinion, formed from the public evidence cited on this page. It was not requested, paid for or approved by the person rated, and it is not financial advice. How it is calculated · Correct something, or reply