
Grade
How this grade was reached
2 of 6 checks count
- Calls vs chanceNot reliably different from chance (44% vs 36%): no change
- Paid accessChecked, not counted yet: this check is still in its precision audit
- Paid promotionChecked, not counted yet: this check is still in its precision audit
- Referral linksChecked: nothing found
- Removed postsNot measured yet: removals count after 30 days of watching
- Regulator listsNot checked yet
- Starting pointEveryone starts at BBB: no red flags found on the checks below.BBB
- FindingsThe checks below found nothing against them.no change
- CallsTheir calls were tested against chance: 44% came good where chance would give 36%. On about 28 calls, an 8-point gap could still be luck: moving a grade needs a record that luck alone would produce less than once in a thousand, so the grade does not change. On this record, the test would reliably detect only an edge of about 44 points or more, so “in line with chance” means there is not yet enough evidence either way, not that there is no skill.44% came goodchance 36%no change
- GradeBBBNo red flags found on the checks listed. The starting point for everyone.
What we checked
- Material read
- 1,014 of their own items and their profile · X profile, posts on X
- Sells paid access
- None found
- Invites paid promotion
- None found
- Referral links
- None found
- Removes their record
- Not yet measured. Removals count only after 30 days of watching, so this grade is provisional until then.
- Regulator warning lists
- Not yet checked
- Last public post
- 0 days ago
- How they talk
- 42% of their directional statements name a price level(described, not scored)
Calls on record
35 calls · 12 hit · 19 missed · 4 open
17 restatements of a call that was still open, each counted once
Hit rate
The rate the call test uses, against what chance would score on the same kinds of call. Recent calls weigh more, and a call restated while still open counts once.
Plain count, every resolved call equal: 12 of 31 came true (39%).
Call history
HitMissOpen, not yet resolved
Market coverage
BTC 22 (63%)TAO 6 (17%)NEAR 4 (11%)ARB 1 (3%)Other 2 (6%)
- 18 SeptOpen
BTCLong80,938 → 100,000· 80d
This is not bearish. It's the opposite and it's a new way of QE or increasing the money supply in the system without impacting the balance sheet. Hard assets will…
Still open.source ↗
- 18 SeptMiss
BTCLong80,938 → 90,000· 19d
Straight candle towards $81,000 after flipping $78,000 for support. What a phenomenal chart it is. Very likely the markets are proceeding towards $90,000 from here.…
Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 17 SeptHit
NEARLong3.012 → 5· 118d
Absolutely phenomenal chart on $NEAR. Sure, it's at the final point of resistance, but given the fact that $ZEC is acting in the way that it is. It's just a matter of…
Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 17 SeptHit
NEARLong2.806 → 3· 3d
Phenomenal push on $NEAR. Just probably expecting to see a short correction before this continues to run towards the recent highs at $3. $ZEC already taking its…
Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 15 SeptHit
ARBLong0.1408 → 0.185· 12d
It seems like we're holding the first level of support for $ARB and are curling back upwards.
Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 14 SeptMiss
BTCLong78,000 → 81,000· 3d
I'm looking at a bullish continuation for #Bitcoin here.
Restates a call that was still open · counted once. Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 14 SeptHit
TAOLong234.8 → 300· 40d
I'd much prefer to see $TAO hold on this level.
Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 13 SeptHit
SUILong0.7232 → 0.85· 17d
A full retest of this support area for $SUI, which I'd like to see hold.
Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 13 SeptMiss
BTCLong78,000 → 90,000· 21d
Monitoring the chart on #Bitcoin tells my gut that we're most likely not going to fall that deep.
Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 10 JunHit
BTCLong64,000 → 75,000· 75d
#Bitcoin remains to be stuck between these levels.
Restates a call that was still open · counted once. Target reached inside the window.source ↗
Associated tokens and projects
- @MNFund_Founder / runs itSelf-declaredSource
- @MNCapital_vcFounder / runs itSelf-declaredSource
- @new_era_financeFounder / runs itSelf-declaredSource
“CIO & Founder @MNFund_ and @MNCapital_vc | Host of @new_era_finance | Macro-Economics, Value Based Investing & Trading | Crypto & Bitcoin Enthusiast”
Grade history
All rating changes →Every change of this person's published letter, newest first, with what moved it.
- CBBB
New rating method (v5): No red flags on the checks listed
Not yet measured. reviewed evidence, wallets, publishing cadence.
Closest in Crypto
See the whole sector →| Name | Category | Reach | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crypto | 114K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 427K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 31K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 128K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 110K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 2.0M | BBB |
Is this you? Claim this profile →
This grade is TradeGrade's opinion, formed from the public evidence cited on this page. It was not requested, paid for or approved by the person rated, and it is not financial advice. How it is calculated · Correct something, or reply