
Grade
How this grade was reached
2 of 6 checks count
- Calls vs chanceNot reliably different from chance (23% vs 38%): no change
- Paid accessChecked, not counted yet: this check is still in its precision audit
- Paid promotionChecked, not counted yet: this check is still in its precision audit
- Referral linksChecked: nothing found
- Removed postsNot measured yet: removals count after 30 days of watching
- Regulator listsNot checked yet
- Starting pointEveryone starts at BBB: no red flags found on the checks below.BBB
- FindingsThe checks below found nothing against them.no change
- CallsTheir calls were tested against chance: 23% came good where chance would give 38%. On about 14 calls, a 14-point gap could still be luck: moving a grade needs a record that luck alone would produce less than once in a thousand, so the grade does not change. On this record, the test would reliably detect only an edge of about 53 points or more, so “in line with chance” means there is not yet enough evidence either way, not that there is no skill.23% came goodchance 38%no change
- GradeBBBNo red flags found on the checks listed. The starting point for everyone.
What we checked
- Material read
- 344 of their own items and their profile · X profile, posts on X
- Sells paid access
- None found
- Invites paid promotion
- None found
- Referral links
- None found
- Removes their record
- Not yet measured. Removals count only after 30 days of watching, so this grade is provisional until then.
- Regulator warning lists
- Not yet checked
- Last public post
- 0 days ago
- How they talk
- 56% of their directional statements name a price level(described, not scored)
Calls on record
19 calls · 4 hit · 11 missed · 4 open
2 restatements of a call that was still open, each counted once
Hit rate
The rate the call test uses, against what chance would score on the same kinds of call. Recent calls weigh more, and a call restated while still open counts once.
Plain count, every resolved call equal: 4 of 15 came true (27%).
Call history
HitMissOpen, not yet resolved
Market coverage
BTC 19 (100%)
- 4 SeptOpen
BTCLong81,071 → 98,000· 80d
#btc As long as we hold above the MO, the target is $98k
Still open.source ↗
- 1 SeptOpen
- 25 AugMiss
BTCLong78,980 → 90,000· 41d
Lot's of people are probably thinking, "are we truly back now?" and are still in disbelieve.. Well, I'd like to assume we're back and we're going to see more upside…
Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 23 JulMiss
BTCLong65,442 → 70,000· 18d
#btc $70k from here at least imo Reclaim $73.5k and I think we see $100k+
Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 17 JulMiss
BTCLong63,100 → 67,000· 13d
#btc Nothing really much changed. We left those lows unswept and went for the highs first which means the draw is on the lows even more now. Still looking for that…
Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 22 JunMiss
BTCLong65,500 → 74,000· 35d
#btc Sub $63k liquidity taken ✅ Local supply resistance at $65.5-66.5k above there we're on our way to $74k+
Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 9 JunOpen
BTCLong63,300 → 200,000· 1301d
#bitcoin No matter how low we go, the target remains $200k+ before 2030
Still open.source ↗
- 27 MayOpen
BTCShort65,500 → 49,000· 330d
#btc Two months later, still holding above blue demand. Classic when you get some red candles everyone straight away starts talking about new weekly lows, so here's…
Still open.source ↗
- 27 AprMiss
BTCShort76,000 → 70,000· 19d
#btc Overall Id say things look bullish the way the weekly closed and how we're holding up here...
Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 20 AprHit
BTCLongtrigger 76,000 → test level 78,280
#btc Scenarios I'd long: 1. A reclaim of $76k high 2. A sweep of $73.2k followed by a reclaim of $76k 3. A sweep of $70k lows into $65k-$69k demand Whichever comes…
Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Target reached inside the window.source ↗
Grade history
All rating changes →Every change of this person's published letter, newest first, with what moved it.
- CBBB
New rating method (v5): No red flags on the checks listed
Not yet measured. reviewed evidence, wallets, publishing cadence.
Closest in Crypto
See the whole sector →| Name | Category | Reach | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crypto | 125K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 203K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 570K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 225K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 147K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 17K | BBB |
Is this you? Claim this profile →
This grade is TradeGrade's opinion, formed from the public evidence cited on this page. It was not requested, paid for or approved by the person rated, and it is not financial advice. How it is calculated · Correct something, or reply