BBB

Grade

Provisional

CJ900X

@CJ900X100K followers

Crypto

TG Grade
BBB
No red flags on the checks listed
Hit rate, tested
30%vs 39% chanceon the same kinds of call
Recent calls weigh more and a restated call counts once. Plain count: 6 of 16 resolved calls (38%).
Calls on record
16
0 open
Material read
443
of their own items

How this grade was reached

2 of 6 checks count

  • Calls vs chanceNot reliably different from chance (30% vs 39%): no change
  • Paid accessChecked, not counted yet: this check is still in its precision audit
  • Paid promotionChecked, not counted yet: this check is still in its precision audit
  • Referral linksChecked: nothing found
  • Removed postsNot measured yet: removals count after 30 days of watching
  • Regulator listsNot checked yet
  1. Starting point
    Everyone starts at BBB: no red flags found on the checks below.
    BBB
  2. Findings
    The checks below found nothing against them.
    no change
  3. Calls
    Their calls were tested against chance: 30% came good where chance would give 39%. On about 11 calls, a 9-point gap could still be luck: moving a grade needs a record that luck alone would produce less than once in a thousand, so the grade does not change. On this record, the test would reliably detect only an edge of about 57 points or more, so “in line with chance” means there is not yet enough evidence either way, not that there is no skill.
    no change
  4. GradeBBBNo red flags found on the checks listed. The starting point for everyone.

What we checked

Material read
443 of their own items and their profile · X profile, posts on X
Sells paid access
None found
Invites paid promotion
None found
Referral links
None found
Removes their record
Not yet measured. Removals count only after 30 days of watching, so this grade is provisional until then.
Regulator warning lists
Not yet checked
How they talk
59% of their directional statements name a price level(described, not scored)

Calls on record

16 calls · 6 hit · 10 missed · 0 open

Hit rate

The rate the call test uses, against what chance would score on the same kinds of call. Recent calls weigh more, and a call restated while still open counts once.

Plain count, every resolved call equal: 6 of 16 came true (38%).

Call history

HitMissOpen, not yet resolved

Market coverage

BTC 14 (88%)XRP 1 (6%)ETH 1 (6%)

  1. 24 Sept

    BTCLong84,476 → 88,000· 4d

    bitcoin:native I think another shove higher into 88-90k makes sense.

    Price moved against the call.source ↗

    Miss
  2. 17 Sept

    XRPLongtrigger 1.3717 → test level 1.41285

    $XRP Initial thoughts were price would take out the equal lows - which it has - but sweep and reclaim, before pushing higher.

    Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Price moved against the call.source ↗

    Miss
  3. 26 Jul

    BTCLong65,413 → 68,000· 7d

    Optimistic Sunday Night Take: Ingredients are there for a decent move up across the board.

    Price moved against the call.source ↗

    Miss
  4. 15 Jul

    BTCLong64,867 → 67,200· 5d

    $BTC Closed this one out in profit. Good trade. I think it still could trade higher, as long as the imbalance below us back into the local range is respected. I think…

    Price moved against the call.source ↗

    Miss
  5. 12 Apr

    BTCLong70,936 → 76,000· 7d

    $BTC Plan for this week Sweep equal lows into demand.

    Target reached inside the window.source ↗

    Hit
  6. 31 Mar

    BTCLongtrigger 66,000 → test level 68,095

    $BTC For longs, this demand zone should hold ~66k.

    Setup. Target reached inside the window.source ↗

    Hit
  7. 1 Feb

    ETHShort2,291 → 2,000· 12d

    $ETH Friend was just asking me if it's a good long here on ETH.

    Target reached inside the window.source ↗

    Hit
  8. 18 Dec

    BTCLong86,119 → 100,000· 30d

    $BTC - HTF I think over the next 30 days, we'll setup a counter-trend move into 100-110k I would love to see a spike of 80k (or we miss 80k and spike 2.6k on ETH…

    Price moved against the call.source ↗

    Miss
  9. 3 Nov

    BTCShort109,666 → 101,000· 7d

    $BTC 98-101k is the downside draw for this week.

    Target reached inside the window.source ↗

    Hit
  10. 27 Aug

    BTCLong110,000 → 113,700· 4d

    $BTC Refined plan from earlier, but still the same idea.

    Price moved against the call.source ↗

    Miss

Every change of this person's published letter, newest first, with what moved it.

  1. CBBB

    New rating method (v5): No red flags on the checks listed

Not yet measured. reviewed evidence, wallets, publishing cadence.

Closest in Crypto

See the whole sector →
Closest by grade in Crypto
NameGrade
crypnuevo@crypnuevoBBB
mikybullcrypto@mikybullcryptoBBB
nordin_eth@nordin_ethBBB
Tatrader_alan@Tatrader_alanBBB
astrocryptoguru@astrocryptoguruBBB
swisstrader09@swisstrader09BBB

Is this you? Claim this profile →

This grade is TradeGrade's opinion, formed from the public evidence cited on this page. It was not requested, paid for or approved by the person rated, and it is not financial advice. How it is calculated · Correct something, or reply