
Grade
How this grade was reached
2 of 6 checks count
- Calls vs chanceNot reliably different from chance (47% vs 31%): no change
- Paid accessChecked, not counted yet: this check is still in its precision audit
- Paid promotionChecked, not counted yet: this check is still in its precision audit
- Referral linksChecked: nothing found
- Removed postsNot measured yet: removals count after 30 days of watching
- Regulator listsNot checked yet
- Starting pointEveryone starts at BBB: no red flags found on the checks below.BBB
- FindingsThe checks below found nothing against them.no change
- CallsTheir calls were tested against chance: 47% came good where chance would give 31%. On about 17 calls, a 15-point gap could still be luck: moving a grade needs a record that luck alone would produce less than once in a thousand, so the grade does not change. On this record, the test would reliably detect only an edge of about 49 points or more, so “in line with chance” means there is not yet enough evidence either way, not that there is no skill.47% came goodchance 31%no change
- GradeBBBNo red flags found on the checks listed. The starting point for everyone.
What we checked
- Material read
- 625 of their own items and their profile · X profile, posts on X
- Sells paid access
- None found
- Invites paid promotion
- None found
- Referral links
- None found
- Removes their record
- Not yet measured. Removals count only after 30 days of watching, so this grade is provisional until then.
- Regulator warning lists
- Not yet checked
- Last public post
- 1 days ago
- How they talk
- 37% of their directional statements name a price level(described, not scored)
Calls on record
24 calls · 7 hit · 14 missed · 3 open
15 restatements of a call that was still open, each counted once
Hit rate
The rate the call test uses, against what chance would score on the same kinds of call. Recent calls weigh more, and a call restated while still open counts once.
Plain count, every resolved call equal: 7 of 21 came true (33%).
Call history
HitMissOpen, not yet resolved
Market coverage
BTC 22 (92%)ETH 2 (8%)
- 4 AugOpen
BTCShort64,125 → 49,000· 252d
What's my invalidation for being bearish? I'd consider pivoting from bearish to bullish if $BTC: 1.
Still open.source ↗
- 21 JulMiss
BTCLong66,292 → 70,000· 12d
Noticing people getting cocky on the timeline about the $BTC bottom being in. On a measly $5k rally or whatever. That’s not a good sign for bulls. Optimism has…
Restates a call that was still open · counted once. Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 15 JulMiss
BTCLong64,768 → 70,000· 23d
$BTC sees a tiny pump and hope floods the timeline.
Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 15 JunHit
BTCShort67,158 → 60,000· 25d
Notice how quiet the permabulls are lately? I have.
Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 2 JunOpen
BTCShort67,492 → 40,000· 365d
Putting the $BTC bear market in perspective: In order for $60,000 to be the cycle bottom it would mean BTC had reached $200,000! But BTC DIDN'T reach $200k! It only…
Restates a call that was still open · counted once. Still open.source ↗
- 1 JunHit
BTCShort72,222 → 61,000· 130d
$BTC H&S Top Breakdown & Channel Breakdown Target: $61,000
Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 31 MayHit
BTCShort73,602 → 60,000· 188d
$BTC Decision Point: Mid-$60k's incoming? We have an H&S Top pattern.
Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 29 MayOpen
BTCShort73,529 → 38,000· 365d
This guy is calling a further $BTC drop a “retarded thesis”.
Restates a call that was still open · counted once. Still open.source ↗
- 28 AprHit
BTCLong76,464 → 80,000· 7d
Bitcoin $BTC Backtest of downward sloping trend line (see arrow).
Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 2 AprOpen
BTCShort66,868 → 40,000· 278d
Bear Market Targets $BTC $35k-$40k $ETH $900 These may seem low, but see the video below for why I think these are actually realistic targets:
Still open.source ↗
Grade history
All rating changes →Every change of this person's published letter, newest first, with what moved it.
- CBBB
New rating method (v5): No red flags on the checks listed
Not yet measured. reviewed evidence, wallets, publishing cadence.
Closest in Crypto
See the whole sector →| Name | Category | Reach | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crypto | 103K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 110K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 31K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 27K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 167K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 821K | BBB |
Is this you? Claim this profile →
This grade is TradeGrade's opinion, formed from the public evidence cited on this page. It was not requested, paid for or approved by the person rated, and it is not financial advice. How it is calculated · Correct something, or reply