
Grade
“🚀 JOIN THE PREMIUM GROUP FOR TRADE SETUPS, MENTORSHIP & TOOLS TO GET YOU PROFITABLE!👇 Discord: https://discord.gg/g2sTz9GZ88 Telegram: https://t.me/cilinixsignalsentrybot Website:…”YouTube channel description ↗
How this grade was reached
2 of 6 checks count
- Calls vs chanceNot reliably different from chance (50% vs 45%): no change
- Paid accessSells paid access. Found, not counted yet: this check is still in its precision audit
- Paid promotionChecked, not counted yet: this check is still in its precision audit
- Referral linksChecked: nothing found
- Removed postsNot measured yet: removals count after 30 days of watching
- Regulator listsNot checked yet
- Starting pointEveryone starts at BBB: no red flags found on the checks below.BBB
- FindingsSells paid access of their own (a membership, course or signals), offered in two or more of their items: whop.com.Shown, not counted: this check has not yet passed its 95% precision audit.not counted
- CallsTheir calls were tested against chance: 50% came good where chance would give 45%. On about 53 calls, a 5-point gap could still be luck: moving a grade needs a record that luck alone would produce less than once in a thousand, so the grade does not change. On this record, the test would reliably detect only an edge of about 27 points or more, so “in line with chance” means there is not yet enough evidence either way, not that there is no skill.50% came goodchance 45%no change
- GradeBBBNo red flags found on the checks listed. The starting point for everyone.
What we checked
- Material read
- 702 of their own items and their profile · X profile, posts on X, YouTube channel description, YouTube video descriptions
- Sells paid access
- Found; not counted until this check passes its audit
- Invites paid promotion
- None found
- Referral links
- None found
- Removes their record
- Not yet measured. Removals count only after 30 days of watching, so this grade is provisional until then.
- Regulator warning lists
- Not yet checked
- Last public post
- 0 days ago
- How they talk
- 61% of their directional statements name a price level(described, not scored)
Calls on record
61 calls · 30 hit · 31 missed · 0 open
4 restatements of a call that was still open, each counted once
Hit rate
The rate the call test uses, against what chance would score on the same kinds of call. Recent calls weigh more, and a call restated while still open counts once.
Plain count, every resolved call equal: 30 of 61 came true (49%).
Call history
HitMissOpen, not yet resolved
Market coverage
BTC 45 (74%)XRP 9 (15%)SOL 2 (3%)ADA 1 (2%)Other 4 (7%)
- 30 SeptMiss
BTCShort83,210 → 80,000· 4d
GM TRADERS!🔥 $BTC bull market, but still more likely to test 80k rather than instantly get back to 87k Major news today at 12:30 UTC, be aware & be ready $LIT with a…
Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 19 SeptHit
SOLLong111.92 → 118· 3d
I think $SOL looks good here👇 > High volume + technically solid breakout above range > SOL/BTC incredibly strong > $47m ETF inflows yesterday (crazy) Now it just…
Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 17 SeptMiss
BTCShort76,540 → 70,500· 11d
There are a ton of things going on but the situation for $BTC can be made quite simple: $BTC is currently finding acceptance below the 30d rVWAP + pqVAH > if we do…
Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 16 SeptMiss
BTCShorttrigger 77,600 → test level 73,549
Psychologically I still think this can be a bottom for $BTC, but we do need to see confirmation of that soon.
Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 3 SeptHit
BTCLongtrigger 77,800 → test level 80,144
GM GM!🔥 Interest rate hike probability at 62%, down from 68% earlier likely because of jobs data which shows a contracting job market.
Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 24 AugHit
BTCLongtrigger 77,600 → test level 79,928
GM!🔥 A bit of red today for Altcoins but nothing to worry about, $TOTAL3 is holding above the pqVAH and there is room for pullbacks if you zoom out.
Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 23 AugHit
BTCLongtrigger 76,500 → test level 78,795
📊Sunday $BTC Update $BTC has lost the lows at 76,500 > bad.. if we don't reclaim them after this brief push into the single print at 76,000. Let's assume we don't…
Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 18 AugHit
BTCLongtrigger 63,600 → test level 66,125
$BTC Morning Thoughts 💬 Strong high volume move into the 90d rVWAP yesterday, first time we have touched this since the 1ts of June when we broke below it.
Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 4 AugMiss
ADALong0.1956 → 0.215· 10d
Not a whole lot of people talking about this but..
Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 22 JulHit
BTCShorttrigger 66,100 → test level 63,996
Good morning!☀️ Couple of things to get you started right today: - CLARITY act passing odds have risen to 47%, up from the low 30's - Yesterday we saw the lowest CB…
Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Target reached inside the window.source ↗
Publishing cadence
- Last 30 days
- at least 50
- Last 90 days
- at least 50
- Days since last upload
- 0
- Typical gap
- 0.1 days
Measured over 50 recent uploads (6 days). The sample hit its cap, so these counts are minimums. Last upload: 22 Aug 2026
Grade history
All rating changes →Every change of this person's published letter, newest first, with what moved it.
- CBBB
New rating method (v5): No red flags on the checks listed
Not yet measured. reviewed evidence, wallets.
Closest in Crypto
See the whole sector →| Name | Category | Reach | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crypto | 821K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 427K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 128K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 2.0M | BBB | |
| Crypto | 31K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 110K | BBB |
Is this you? Claim this profile →
This grade is TradeGrade's opinion, formed from the public evidence cited on this page. It was not requested, paid for or approved by the person rated, and it is not financial advice. How it is calculated · Correct something, or reply