
Grade
How this grade was reached
2 of 6 checks count
- Calls vs chanceNot reliably different from chance (46% vs 43%): no change
- Paid accessChecked, not counted yet: this check is still in its precision audit
- Paid promotionChecked, not counted yet: this check is still in its precision audit
- Referral linksChecked: nothing found
- Removed postsNot measured yet: removals count after 30 days of watching
- Regulator listsNot checked yet
- Starting pointEveryone starts at BBB: no red flags found on the checks below.BBB
- FindingsThe checks below found nothing against them.no change
- CallsTheir calls were tested against chance: 46% came good where chance would give 43%. On about 12 calls, a 3-point gap could still be luck: moving a grade needs a record that luck alone would produce less than once in a thousand, so the grade does not change. On this record, the test would reliably detect only an edge of about 56 points or more, so “in line with chance” means there is not yet enough evidence either way, not that there is no skill.46% came goodchance 43%no change
- GradeBBBNo red flags found on the checks listed. The starting point for everyone.
What we checked
- Material read
- 659 of their own items and their profile · X profile, posts on X
- Sells paid access
- None found
- Invites paid promotion
- None found
- Referral links
- None found
- Removes their record
- Not yet measured. Removals count only after 30 days of watching, so this grade is provisional until then.
- Regulator warning lists
- Not yet checked
- How they talk
- 39% of their directional statements name a price level(described, not scored)
Calls on record
15 calls · 6 hit · 7 missed · 2 open
1 restatement of a call that was still open, each counted once
Hit rate
The rate the call test uses, against what chance would score on the same kinds of call. Recent calls weigh more, and a call restated while still open counts once.
Plain count, every resolved call equal: 6 of 13 came true (46%).
Call history
HitMissOpen, not yet resolved
Market coverage
BTC 10 (67%)ETH 3 (20%)DOGE 2 (13%)
- 29 SeptOpen
BTCLong84,333 → 98,000· 35d
If we start to look at a larger scale Current Range on $BTC we can start to notice a few things.
Restates a call that was still open · counted once. Still open.source ↗
- 21 SeptOpen
BTCLong81,178 → 98,179· 93d
$BTC continues to have another weekly close above the 2025 Yearly Lows.
Still open.source ↗
- 14 SeptMiss
BTCLongtrigger 74,500 → test level 80,029
Key levels not lost on the weekly close for both $BTC and $ETH No reason to think downside until those levels are lost $BTC - 2025 Yearly Lows ($74,500) $ETH - Local…
Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 10 SeptOpen
BTCLong78,306 → 98,000· 54d
Few differences I am seeing from previous cycle bottom compared to where we are within our current cycle bottom.
Still open.source ↗
- 28 AugMiss
BTCLongtrigger 78,419 → test level 82,033
Dips aren't really happening right now. If we get a re-test of $78,419 nPOC on $BTC, I would be using that level as your dip buying opportunity. We aren't getting…
Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 20 AugHit
DOGELong0.08325 → 0.09· 11d
Another winner coming from a very easy and straightforward setup on $DOGE.
Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 11 AugHit
ETHLong1,875 → 2,500· 274d
$ETH has a fairly straightforward setup going on.
Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 28 JulMiss
ETHShort1,892 → 1,786· 6d
All nPOC levels have closed on $BTC but we still have a few remaining on $ETH.
Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 19 JulHit
BTCLongtrigger 62,793 → test level 66,523
If we get these re-test levels on bitcoin:native and $ETH you should consider taking a stab at some longs if you aren't already positioned.
Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 4 JulMiss
BTCLong62,943 → 71,365· 30d
My target on $BTC still remains $71,365 nPOC print for the month of July. Does it go straight there?
Price moved against the call.source ↗
Grade history
All rating changes →Every change of this person's published letter, newest first, with what moved it.
- DBBB
New rating method (v5): No red flags on the checks listed
Not yet measured. reviewed evidence, wallets, publishing cadence.
Closest in Crypto
See the whole sector →| Name | Category | Reach | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crypto | 166K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 65K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 170K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 730K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 472K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 68K | BBB |
Is this you? Claim this profile →
This grade is TradeGrade's opinion, formed from the public evidence cited on this page. It was not requested, paid for or approved by the person rated, and it is not financial advice. How it is calculated · Correct something, or reply