
Grade
How this grade was reached
2 of 6 checks count
- Calls vs chanceNot reliably different from chance (39% vs 39%): no change
- Paid accessChecked, not counted yet: this check is still in its precision audit
- Paid promotionChecked, not counted yet: this check is still in its precision audit
- Referral linksChecked: nothing found
- Removed postsNot measured yet: removals count after 30 days of watching
- Regulator listsNot checked yet
- Starting pointEveryone starts at BBB: no red flags found on the checks below.BBB
- FindingsThe checks below found nothing against them.no change
- CallsTheir calls were tested against chance: 39% came good where chance would give 39%. On about 16 calls their record is level with chance, so the grade does not change. On this record, the test would reliably detect only an edge of about 49 points or more, so “in line with chance” means there is not yet enough evidence either way, not that there is no skill.39% came goodchance 39%no change
- GradeBBBNo red flags found on the checks listed. The starting point for everyone.
What we checked
- Material read
- 2,228 of their own items and their profile · X profile, posts on X
- Sells paid access
- None found
- Invites paid promotion
- None found
- Referral links
- None found
- Removes their record
- Not yet measured. Removals count only after 30 days of watching, so this grade is provisional until then.
- Regulator warning lists
- Not yet checked
- Last public post
- 0 days ago
- How they talk
- 28% of their directional statements name a price level(described, not scored)
Calls on record
18 calls · 7 hit · 11 missed · 0 open
Hit rate
The rate the call test uses, against what chance would score on the same kinds of call. Recent calls weigh more, and a call restated while still open counts once.
Plain count, every resolved call equal: 7 of 18 came true (39%).
Call history
HitMissOpen, not yet resolved
Market coverage
BTC 16 (89%)ETH 2 (11%)
- 14 SeptMiss
ETHLong2,524 → 2,700· 4d
The trigger worked perfectly: $ETH filled the long position and reached the first TP, right at the first resistance level.
Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 22 JulHit
BTCLong63,500 → 70,000· 39d
$BTC has performed well, but we have now entered a period of consolidation.
Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 6 JulHit
BTCShorttrigger 65,000 → test level 61,786
$BTC To me, the chart here is extremely straightforward.
Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 6 JulMiss
BTCLongtrigger 61,000 → test level 65,607
$BTC To me, the chart here is extremely straightforward.
Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 6 JunMiss
BTCLong58,000 → 70,000· 5d
$BTC All I did was draw two simple lines on the chart.
Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 1 JunHit
BTCShort72,000 → 65,000· 51d
$BTC Key levels Nothing more A drop of 72k would take us below 65k
Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 28 MayMiss
BTCLongtrigger 72,000 → test level 75,762
$BTC Let me be clear: 72k is key for the daily trend to turn north If we hold it, that’s fine; if we lose it, we’ll go much lower
Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 28 MayHit
BTCShorttrigger 72,000 → test level 69,840
$BTC Let me be clear: 72k is key for the daily trend to turn north If we hold it, that’s fine; if we lose it, we’ll go much lower
Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 25 MayMiss
BTCLongtrigger 76,000 → test level 79,781
$BTC On lower timeframes, the situation remains fairly straightforward: all price action continues to revolve around the liquidity present above and below this range.…
Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 25 MayHit
BTCShorttrigger 76,000 → test level 73,720
$BTC On lower timeframes, the situation remains fairly straightforward: all price action continues to revolve around the liquidity present above and below this range.…
Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Target reached inside the window.source ↗
Associated tokens and projects
“Italian Crypto Trader & Investor ✍️ Contact / Assistant: @CryptoTyborg Discord: @WealthGroup”
Grade history
All rating changes →Every change of this person's published letter, newest first, with what moved it.
- CBBB
New rating method (v5): No red flags on the checks listed
Not yet measured. reviewed evidence, wallets, publishing cadence.
Closest in Crypto
See the whole sector →| Name | Category | Reach | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crypto | 472K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 730K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 225K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 65K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 105K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 166K | BBB |
Is this you? Claim this profile →
This grade is TradeGrade's opinion, formed from the public evidence cited on this page. It was not requested, paid for or approved by the person rated, and it is not financial advice. How it is calculated · Correct something, or reply