
Grade
How this grade was reached
2 of 6 checks count
- Calls vs chanceNot reliably different from chance (27% vs 26%): no change
- Paid accessChecked, not counted yet: this check is still in its precision audit
- Paid promotionChecked, not counted yet: this check is still in its precision audit
- Referral linksChecked: nothing found
- Removed postsNot measured yet: removals count after 30 days of watching
- Regulator listsNot checked yet
- Starting pointEveryone starts at BBB: no red flags found on the checks below.BBB
- FindingsThe checks below found nothing against them.no change
- CallsTheir calls were tested against chance: 27% came good where chance would give 26%. On about 13 calls, a 2-point gap could still be luck: moving a grade needs a record that luck alone would produce less than once in a thousand, so the grade does not change. On this record, the test would reliably detect only an edge of about 56 points or more, so “in line with chance” means there is not yet enough evidence either way, not that there is no skill.27% came goodchance 26%no change
- GradeBBBNo red flags found on the checks listed. The starting point for everyone.
What we checked
- Material read
- 1,393 of their own items and their profile · X profile, posts on X
- Sells paid access
- None found
- Invites paid promotion
- None found
- Referral links
- None found
- Removes their record
- Not yet measured. Removals count only after 30 days of watching, so this grade is provisional until then.
- Regulator warning lists
- Not yet checked
- Last public post
- 0 days ago
- How they talk
- 24% of their directional statements name a price level(described, not scored)
Calls on record
17 calls · 5 hit · 11 missed · 1 open
4 restatements of a call that was still open, each counted once
Hit rate
The rate the call test uses, against what chance would score on the same kinds of call. Recent calls weigh more, and a call restated while still open counts once.
Plain count, every resolved call equal: 5 of 16 came true (31%).
Call history
HitMissOpen, not yet resolved
Market coverage
BTC 6 (35%)ETH 4 (24%)SUI 3 (18%)DOGE 3 (18%)Other 1 (6%)
- 22 MayMiss
BTCLong76,537 → 80,000· 11d
#Bitcoin / $BTC Retest support in lower 70s, run it back to 80s / 90s and range for the summer Send to $100K+ and new ATHs in fall & winter
Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 10 AprOpen
SUILong0.9375 → 2· 365d
$SUI has already quietly breaking above a major resistance level - send it back to $2+ with haste.
Still open.source ↗
- 4 MarMiss
BTCLong73,020 → 80,000· 6d
#Bitcoin / $BTC Not much resistance between here and $80K+
Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 25 FebHit
ETHLong1,852 → 2,000· 3d
#Ethereum / $ETH If you just zoom in a bit, looks pretty dang good for a spot for a nice squeeze back to $2K+ out of this range.
Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 27 JanMiss
BTCLong88,409 → 100,000· 62d
#Bitcoin / $BTC Send it to $100K+ with haste.
Restates a call that was still open · counted once. Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 9 JanMiss
BTCLong90,303 → 100,000· 22d
They're selling $1.00 for $0.25. Might still be able to get an entry a bit cheaper, but I think now is a solid time to start scaling in to position for an end of…
Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 8 DecMiss
ETHLong3,146 → 4,000· 65d
$ETH is on the verge of breaking out. Send it back above $4K with haste.
Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 21 OctMiss
DOGELong0.20305 → 0.25· 15d
#Dogecoin / $DOGE Expecting a swift reclaim of $0.25 soon There's A LOT of thin air to fill from the market nuke a couple weeks back
Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 20 OctMiss
SUILong2.5981 → 3· 7d
$SUI found solid support from the summer lows.
Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 14 OctOpen
BTCLong111,435 → 500,000· 365d
#Bitcoin once again bounced off support from the base of the range it's been trading in the past several months.
Restates a call that was still open · counted once. Still open.source ↗
Associated tokens and projects
- @LedgArt_ioFounder / runs itSelf-declaredSource
“καλέω: to call This is my journal Co-Founder - @LedgArt_io”
- HMMHeavily promoted, no declared linkObserved in posts
Share of cashtag mentions in archived posts. $HMM in 11 of 28 cashtag mentions across archived posts, not declared in bio
Grade history
All rating changes →Every change of this person's published letter, newest first, with what moved it.
- DBBB
New rating method (v5): No red flags on the checks listed
Not yet measured. reviewed evidence, wallets, publishing cadence.
Closest in Crypto
See the whole sector →| Name | Category | Reach | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crypto | 472K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 65K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 609K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 105K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 166K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 225K | BBB |
Is this you? Claim this profile →
This grade is TradeGrade's opinion, formed from the public evidence cited on this page. It was not requested, paid for or approved by the person rated, and it is not financial advice. How it is calculated · Correct something, or reply