
Grade
How this grade was reached
2 of 6 checks count
- Calls vs chanceNot reliably different from chance (25% vs 36%): no change
- Paid accessChecked, not counted yet: this check is still in its precision audit
- Paid promotionChecked, not counted yet: this check is still in its precision audit
- Referral linksChecked: nothing found
- Removed postsNot measured yet: removals count after 30 days of watching
- Regulator listsNot checked yet
- Starting pointEveryone starts at BBB: no red flags found on the checks below.BBB
- FindingsThe checks below found nothing against them.no change
- CallsTheir calls were tested against chance: 25% came good where chance would give 36%. On about 8 calls, an 11-point gap could still be luck: moving a grade needs a record that luck alone would produce less than once in a thousand, so the grade does not change. On this record, even getting every call right would not yet clear the bar: it needs more resolved calls before it could show an edge.25% came goodchance 36%no change
- GradeBBBNo red flags found on the checks listed. The starting point for everyone.
What we checked
- Material read
- 709 of their own items and their profile · X profile, posts on X
- Sells paid access
- None found
- Invites paid promotion
- None found
- Referral links
- None found
- Removes their record
- Not yet measured. Removals count only after 30 days of watching, so this grade is provisional until then.
- Regulator warning lists
- Not yet checked
- How they talk
- 39% of their directional statements name a price level(described, not scored)
Calls on record
13 calls · 5 hit · 8 missed · 0 open
Hit rate
The rate the call test uses, against what chance would score on the same kinds of call. Recent calls weigh more, and a call restated while still open counts once.
Plain count, every resolved call equal: 5 of 13 came true (38%).
Call history
HitMissOpen, not yet resolved
Market coverage
BTC 11 (85%)ETH 2 (15%)
- 21 JulMiss
BTCLong66,842 → 69,000· 5d
$BTC update: Great start of the week for Bitcoin as analysed.
Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 20 JunMiss
BTCLongtrigger 64,000 → test level 65,920
$BTC update: Nice +12% recovery (vs 15% I expected).
Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 3 JunMiss
BTCLong67,067 → 70,000· 6d
$BTC update: My last setup was wrong, sorry - price broke through that $72k area due to US-Iran escalation news.
Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 31 MayMiss
BTCLongtrigger 73,000 → test level 75,952
$BTC Sunday update: This is the trade that I'll try to get this week: I see a long wick to the downside between $73k-$72.5k - price tends to retrace these type of…
Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 19 MayHit
BTCShort76,873 → 71,000· 28d
$BTC update: Now that it's confirmed that Bitcoin only deviated above the range highs (we're back inside the range), I'm sticking to the previous BTC Sunday update…
Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 18 MarMiss
BTCLongtrigger 69,000 → test level 73,288
$BTC update: We saw a reaction at $75k-$76k.
Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 24 SeptHit
BTCLong112,942 → 120,000· 24d
$BTC update: As you know from previous posts, this is what I see in the mid-term and short-term: • Mid term: Should range lows hold, then we'll naturally see a push…
Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 11 JulHit
ETHLong2,500 → 2,800· 15d
$ETH update: This was my favorite trade of the year so far!
Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 21 MayMiss
BTCLong108,604 → 115,000· 10d
$BTC update: New ATH unlocked as promised! 🤣🤝 Personally, I don't think that was all.
Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 27 FebHit
BTCLongtrigger 87,100 → test level 89,713
$BTC update: In conclusion... careful entering longs. I'll only enter if: a) Price drops to $77k-$78k: CME gap + 1W50EMA. There should be a very strong reaction from…
Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Target reached inside the window.source ↗
Grade history
All rating changes →Every change of this person's published letter, newest first, with what moved it.
- DBBB
New rating method (v5): No red flags on the checks listed
Not yet measured. reviewed evidence, wallets, publishing cadence.
Closest in Crypto
See the whole sector →| Name | Category | Reach | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crypto | 100K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 77K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 17K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 91K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 69K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 225K | BBB |
Is this you? Claim this profile →
This grade is TradeGrade's opinion, formed from the public evidence cited on this page. It was not requested, paid for or approved by the person rated, and it is not financial advice. How it is calculated · Correct something, or reply