
Grade
How this grade was reached
2 of 6 checks count
- Calls vs chanceNot reliably different from chance (64% vs 41%): no change
- Paid accessChecked, not counted yet: this check is still in its precision audit
- Paid promotionChecked, not counted yet: this check is still in its precision audit
- Referral linksChecked: nothing found
- Removed postsNot measured yet: removals count after 30 days of watching
- Regulator listsNot checked yet
- Starting pointEveryone starts at BBB: no red flags found on the checks below.BBB
- FindingsThe checks below found nothing against them.no change
- CallsTheir calls were tested against chance: 64% came good where chance would give 41%. On about 18 calls, a 23-point gap could still be luck: moving a grade needs a record that luck alone would produce less than once in a thousand, so the grade does not change. On this record, the test would reliably detect only an edge of about 46 points or more, so “in line with chance” means there is not yet enough evidence either way, not that there is no skill.64% came goodchance 41%no change
- GradeBBBNo red flags found on the checks listed. The starting point for everyone.
What we checked
- Material read
- 373 of their own items and their profile · X profile, posts on X
- Sells paid access
- None found
- Invites paid promotion
- None found
- Referral links
- None found
- Removes their record
- Not yet measured. Removals count only after 30 days of watching, so this grade is provisional until then.
- Regulator warning lists
- Not yet checked
- Last public post
- 0 days ago
- How they talk
- 79% of their directional statements name a price level(described, not scored)
Calls on record
21 calls · 11 hit · 8 missed · 2 open
Hit rate
The rate the call test uses, against what chance would score on the same kinds of call. Recent calls weigh more, and a call restated while still open counts once.
Plain count, every resolved call equal: 11 of 19 came true (58%).
Call history
HitMissOpen, not yet resolved
Market coverage
BTC 9 (43%)ETH 6 (29%)ZEC 4 (19%)SOL 2 (10%)
- 19 SeptHit
BTCLongtrigger 83,500 → test level 86,005
If you want to stand in front of this megaphone pattern forming on $BTC, be my guest.
Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 3 SeptHit
ZECLongtrigger 890 → test level 916.7
zcash:native still loading continuation of its parabolic move.
Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 18 AugHit
BTCLongtrigger 65,500 → test level 67,465
$BTC shortsqueeze.exe coming on a break above $65.5K.
Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 10 AugHit
ZECShort500 → 480· 3d
$ZEC now trying to prevent a breakdown after a clear Upthrust After Distribution (UTAD) and failure to displace $530 resistance.
Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 5 AugHit
BTCLongtrigger 67,000 → test level 72,000
The lowest-risk trades in this $BTC range are simple.
Setup. Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 4 AugHit
ZECLong495 → 510· 3d
$ZEC is starting to build the structure for another breakout attempt.
Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 1 AugHit
ZECLong470.68 → 490· 3d
$ZEC is starting to look interesting again.
Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 18 JulHit
BTCLongtrigger 64,800 → test level 66,744
I’m a HTF $BTC bear. So how am I the one trying to convince people to be bullish here?
Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Target reached inside the window.source ↗
- 9 JulMiss
BTCLong64,800 → 67,000· 5d
I'll be looking for something like this on $BTC if we get the break above $64.8K.
Price moved against the call.source ↗
- 3 JulMiss
ETHLongtrigger 1,800 → test level 1,854
$ETH Pull the trigger above $1800. Do absolutely nothing before then. I'll happily pay higher once ETH clears a level stacked with both range resistance and the…
Setup, no stop named, 3% risk assumed. Price moved against the call.source ↗
Grade history
All rating changes →Every change of this person's published letter, newest first, with what moved it.
- BBBB
New rating method (v5): No red flags on the checks listed
Not yet measured. reviewed evidence, wallets, publishing cadence.
Closest in Crypto
See the whole sector →| Name | Category | Reach | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crypto | 15K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 167K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 27K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 509K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 103K | BBB | |
| Crypto | 88K | BBB |
Is this you? Claim this profile →
This grade is TradeGrade's opinion, formed from the public evidence cited on this page. It was not requested, paid for or approved by the person rated, and it is not financial advice. How it is calculated · Correct something, or reply